The Delicate Grasp

A soft robotic gripper gentle enough for tofu

Project poster — “Touch, calibrated.” A white soft gripper lifting a block of tofu above a laboratory scale on blue cloth, captioned “gentleness is a motion profile.”

09
Year — 2022–23

Categories

Role

  • BEng thesis — Chulalongkorn University
  • Modeling, fabrication & validation
  • Published in Robotics (MDPI), 2023

Robotics (MDPI) · 12(4) · 2023

Soft pneumatic grippers are the natural choice for delicate objects — and a control nightmare, because their greatest strength is that they deform. Industry-standard on-off pressure control delivers an abrupt grab that pulverizes a block of tofu. This project paired smarter hardware with smarter estimation: a two-stage pneumatic architecture for fine control, and a virtual sensor that infers the gripper’s internal volume from pure physics.

Problem

Silicone fingers have effectively infinite degrees of freedom and deeply nonlinear behavior. The precise industrial alternative — a screw compressor — is far too expensive for practical deployment. And the one variable that determines grasp quality, the gripper’s internal air volume, cannot be measured by any sensor.

The insight that reframed the problem: delicate objects are damaged by momentum, not just force. The controller must shape the velocity of the grasp, not merely its pressure.

The full physical rig beside its schematic: compressor, regulator, cylinder on ball-screw stage, and gripper
Synergy pressure control — coarse supply, then a motor-driven finishing pass

Approach

The hardware works like a rough cut followed by a finishing pass: an ordinary compressor with a digital regulator gets pressure roughly right, while a pneumatic cylinder driven by a ball-screw stage and DC servo fine-tunes pressure and volume through precise linear motion.

On the software side, a full dynamic model of the electromechanical-pneumatic chain — motor circuit, ball screw, cylinder, and the silicone gripper as a spring-damper system, coupled through Boyle’s law — lets an unknown-input nonlinear observer reconstruct the gripper’s volume from nothing but the motor encoder. A PID loop tuned by Ziegler–Nichols then drives that estimated volume to a commanded grasping profile, in real time at 1 kHz on embedded hardware.

The 3D-printed mold and the finished cast-silicone gripper
Cast in-house — vacuum-degassed RA25RA silicone
Control architecture block diagram with the observer feeding the PID loop
The observer feeds the loop a state no sensor can see
The tofu test: if the gripper can pick up tofu without crushing it, the control works.
The cast-silicone soft gripper holding a delicate object intact
The test, passed — the cast-silicone gripper closed on a block it never crushed
Volume step responses across PID gain sets, showing the zero-overshoot winner
Gain study — the winning response settles in under a second
Gripper volume tracking repeated open-close command cycles
Repeated open–close profiles, tracked cleanly

Performance

Real-time control rate
1 kHz
Settling time
< 1 s
Overshoot
0%
Volume range
20–33 mL
Sensors on the gripper
0
Published in
Robotics · MDPI

Outcome

The observer’s volume estimate converged rapidly onto true values across the full working range, proving a physical sensor unnecessary. Volume control achieved sub-second settling with zero overshoot and near-zero steady-state error — the response profile a momentum-free grasp requires. The system demonstrably handles tofu, where conventional on-off control fails outright.

In collaboration with
  • Chulalongkorn University, Mechanical Engineering

Next case study

10 / 11